Yes, thanks Simon, you have a point: they do look a little clean, don't they? I'm not a weathering modeller and I generally go for a fairly pristine, recently out-shopped look, but used-looking wooden boards are within my abilities...Possibly a little coal-stained wood-coloured paint on the coal-boards in the tender, and maybe the cab floor?
Thanks Mark - I think we've found it, but it was shut today (Sunday and unlike the UK, a lot of shops and restaurants do actually shut: takes me back to my youth…).I seem to remember a shop near the sea front that sold high-end diecast, I only saw their window display, so I don't know what was inside!
Mark
(it doesn't seem quite right to call something from the late 19th or early 20th century a 'logo'):
Thank you Simon, much better I think; 'logo' is apparently a 1930s abreviation of logogram or logotype, whereas 'monogram' is from the late 17th century French which is in turn from the Greek… so there you go!a monogram?
Morning Alan, another excellent suggestion but I'm not sure if that was actually a PLM trade mark (though that term has also been around a long time apparently, being derived from a 14th century version).A trade mark?
Thank you Simon, much better I think; 'logo' is apparently a 1930s abreviation of logogram or logotype, whereas 'monogram' is from the late 17th century French which is in turn from the Greek… so there you go!
Simon, quite right that logotype is of course from just as ancient a root as monogram; I should have looked at Wiki as well as googling and having done so (sidestepping the rabbit holes!) I learn that in the days of hot metal typesetting a logotype was one word cast as a single piece of type, as opposed to a ligature, which is two or more letters joined, but not forming a word.
So does that mean that PLM is a ligature? I think it more usually refers to things like ae and oe where they're joined so I think perhaps logo / monogram / crest is still better after all.
Daifly, crest, badge and motif all cover it too of course. Interestingly though, there's a page on a site called wagons-lit-diffusion (I'm typing this on my phone and can't see how to copy a link) that shows 9 different PLM logos (their word) but none like the lettering on this bridge.
I don't think that in those days marketing and branding were as omnipresent and as influential as they are today, when nothing emanating from a large company is permitted to show anything other than officially sanctioned graphics. In those days (I suspect perhaps up to the 1930s even) things were much less controlled and a company building a bridge for a railway network might be told to include their initials as part of the casting but not necessarily be given artwork to follow.
I'm sure I've come across similar examples before, with UK companies, where lettering was used that looked quite unlike their usual style, but I can't now remember where I've seen them… Anyone else know of similar examples?
Ensignia was my first thought.And saw an iron bridge with very old PLM lettering (it doesn't seem quite right to call something from the late 19th or early 20th century a 'logo'):
Ah, thank you Brian - cartouche, another similar word that was on the tip of my tongue (probably because we're in France currently!). Great word but I think a cartouche is usually more of a graphic design than purely lettering - I may be wrong though, it's by no stretch my area of expertise!Chas.
That's great stuff, and this is turning on to a real and absorbing rabbit hole. I'd not have called it a logo - that seems a too modern-a-word for it. It has some great similarities to the cartouche (chosen and probably inaccurate) I've seen applied elsewhere. A prime example is the Paris Metro which the Parisians (quite rightly IMHO) both respect and admire as part of their history.
Brian
Yes indeed, that's a good example. I'm not a GWR man and I'm not sure I've seen that entwined version before but the GWR bench castings are certainly something I've seen before (a friend has one i.e. he has a bench, not just one casting!) so it's very likely that's one of things I was thinking of…Entwined GWR monogram?
Eg GWR monogram (1870-1912) - 2 PAIRS SMALL SIZE ONLY
and of course, the platform bench cast bases, and the later roundel.
Voilà - merci mon ami, je suis d'accord, c'est la monogramme!This might be
View attachment 180376,
but given that Macfarlane's catalogue of the same period invites personalisation of iron castings with crests, monograms and dates, and that a monogram describes a grouping of letters that may or may not be intertwined.........c'est la monogramme!