Hi Bernard,
Here's a picture of a couple of nameplates which I have etched using the machine in the video. Sorry for the picture quality, but hopefully it answers your question. My CAD software tells me that the 4mm version of the plate has letters 0.271mm high, the 7mm version corresponding larger. 0.271mm is tiny, and difficult to read even with a magnifying glass.
I have not cleaned these plates, and you can still see the burr which is raised by the laser around the edges. This of course doesn't appear with a chemical etch.
View attachment 222542
With regard to other matters raised by your question, I agree completely with what others have said. These machines are currently too expensive for hobby use, very slow and will never be a direct replacement for chemical etching. That said the prices are tumbling and non-branded equivalents can be found at a third of the price of this particular machine.
Fibre Lasers can do things however that chemical etching cannot, such as variable 3d etching which does open interesting possibilities.
I agree with simond that an enclosure will be a necessary addition should I keep the machine for any length of time. I currently have it on loan - it's not mine, I'm just trying to ascertain its suitability as a prototyping tool.
Finally, regarding the comments about my hands being on the machine bed, only once in the video was my hand 'in-shot' whilst the laser was active, and then it was outside of the laser frame. I was trying to draw attention to the amount of smoke produced whilst engraving, which was difficult for me to see with the laser glasses on. It turned out whilst editing the video that the camera had picked it up perfectly and so I needn't have bothered.
Cheers,
James