flexible_coupling
Western Thunderer
After the pain of this project - I'd advise anything other than salt.... it may have just been the rattle-can paint but it's not been a fun ride!
I hadn't noticed that before. It's possible to find exceptions of course, particularly among the preserved/restored locos but as a general rule, colour photographic evidence of in-service locos bears out Simon's observation.but I'd go with the roof and foot plating painted in body colour rather than black. Probably the wheels and frames too but then very let down into earth tones by weathering.
I think that is more typical of actual practice on industrial locos, but I stand to be shot down in flames as others prove otherwise!
Just a thought, if the Fowler was still in industrial service through the 1960s into the 1970s there is a fair chance that an electric starter motor would have been fitted and the separate starting engine on the footplate removed. Whether the batteries would have fitted within the bonnet would probably depend on whether a newer, smaller engine had replaced the original, so possibly a battery box on the footplate. It would make it look a bit different.
Odd question - as I haven't been able to figure it out.... what is the... thing on the right-hand-side of the running board, by the sandbox? It looks as though it's some kind of elbow joint/outlet valve but I just can't quite figure it out......
Here's a timber battery box on the left running plate.
http://www.embsayboltonabbeyrailway.org.uk/photos/ca133.jpg
P.S. Ignore the black cab roof