Dikitriki
Flying Squad
Neil said:It took me about the same time, four days with multiple tea breaks to build the baseboards for Morfa (18'x12' - permanent fixture) as it did to build those for Abergwynant (5'9"x11" - highly portable) though the Abergwynant time also includes the lighting rig. Having said that I'm not sure if speed of build is ever a virtue in our hobby, if we enjoy making models then spending longer doing it would seem to be a better goal to aim for. I like the notion of savouring each phase of the build, rather than charging ahead to the finish. [sweeping generalisation] If as I suspect we tend to prefer the making to playing [/sweeping generalisation] then once a layout is finished what next?
Interesting points.
My experience with Heyside is that it took a huge amount of time to redesign and rebuild it as an exhibition layout. It would have been far, far easier to build it in situ without thinking of such things as height adjustable legs, baseboard alignment, track alignment, electric jumpers etc. I suspect it's taken maybe 8 times as long.
The last question raised has occupied my mind too. I don't really enjoy building layouts, and Heyside, though built I hope to the highest standard I can, will be my first and last 'serious' layout (though once it is 'finished' I shall help the others in the group build their layouts) . I have decided that the interest will be maintained over a long period of time by varying the time period. Initially it will be steam/diesel crossover, we can nearly run it as diesel only anyway, even now, and then it can go to immediate post WWII, which means I can build the ex L&Y 0-8-0s, 2-4-2T, and a host of ex LMS and ex LNWR locos, as well as some very interesting coaching stock. As I am principally a builder of locos and to a lesser extent stock, that will keep me happy for the rest of my days, and enable us to ring the changes with only minimal alterations to eg signboards etc. The layout will be in effect a showcase for the stock.
That's the theory anyway.
Richard