daifly
Western Thunderer
Hi Brian
This is indeed a mystery. It’s probably appropriate for me to post my analysis in detail for review by others in case I’ve made a CU.
Your photo of the 2-8-0 has a number of ‘diagnostic’ features.
It has no evidence of a welded tank repair.
It has no cab shutter on the fireman’s (left hand) side
The bunker handrail is in the ‘low’ position with 5 rivets visible above it.
It has a straight footplate with no raised portion above the cylinders.
LH cab window guard mid-rail is horizontal
The 8 locos listed in Sixsmiths book The 2-8-0 Tank Papers as being at Barry are as follows. My reasons for discounting them were as stated;
4247 - weld repaired tank, ‘high’ bunker handrail
4248 - cab shutter still present post-1967
4253 - raised footplate
4270 - cab shutter still present post-1967 but see this
4277 - weld repaired tank, cab shutter still present post-1967
5224 - raised footplate
5227 - weld repaired tank, cab window guard mid-rail is sloping
5239 - raised footplate
However, having reviewed everything yet again, I’m coming to the conclusion that with the scores of photos and enthusiasts that crawled over and photographed the residents of Dai’s yard there will not be a mystery loco. I suspect that you, like others, may have been misled by the markings on the rods. Were the rods fitted or in the cab or bunker? Dai will have bought the weight of the rods with the loco and would expect them to be there! If they were not fitted then any set could have been loaded.
The presence of a cab shutter on 4270 which I used to discount 4270 I now suspect is actually a scrapyard addition! Close comparison of your original 1967 photo with the photo in the Flickr link shows a lot of similarities in dents, rust holes, cab window guard rail spacing etc. so I will put my vote on that one.
Dave
This is indeed a mystery. It’s probably appropriate for me to post my analysis in detail for review by others in case I’ve made a CU.
Your photo of the 2-8-0 has a number of ‘diagnostic’ features.
It has no evidence of a welded tank repair.
It has no cab shutter on the fireman’s (left hand) side
The bunker handrail is in the ‘low’ position with 5 rivets visible above it.
It has a straight footplate with no raised portion above the cylinders.
LH cab window guard mid-rail is horizontal
The 8 locos listed in Sixsmiths book The 2-8-0 Tank Papers as being at Barry are as follows. My reasons for discounting them were as stated;
4247 - weld repaired tank, ‘high’ bunker handrail
4248 - cab shutter still present post-1967
4253 - raised footplate
4270 - cab shutter still present post-1967 but see this
4277 - weld repaired tank, cab shutter still present post-1967
5224 - raised footplate
5227 - weld repaired tank, cab window guard mid-rail is sloping
5239 - raised footplate
However, having reviewed everything yet again, I’m coming to the conclusion that with the scores of photos and enthusiasts that crawled over and photographed the residents of Dai’s yard there will not be a mystery loco. I suspect that you, like others, may have been misled by the markings on the rods. Were the rods fitted or in the cab or bunker? Dai will have bought the weight of the rods with the loco and would expect them to be there! If they were not fitted then any set could have been loaded.
The presence of a cab shutter on 4270 which I used to discount 4270 I now suspect is actually a scrapyard addition! Close comparison of your original 1967 photo with the photo in the Flickr link shows a lot of similarities in dents, rust holes, cab window guard rail spacing etc. so I will put my vote on that one.
Dave