I think the brake rodding is very noticeable, I do a representation on most of mine, if only because my layout track heights are around 55” (140cm in new money) off the floor.I don’t know about that, Matt, almost no one notices these things after a coat of paint - and you do that very nicely. Here’s one more, the first of the pair of dia. 1666.
View attachment 159264
This one has replacement W irons (Ambis) headstocks and brakes (a multitude) which sounds like more work than it was. It’s now in the queue for painting (bare metal and wood).
Adam
These are stunning, Adam. Beautiful and wonderfully rendered.I’ve found time for a spot of weathering. The result is the first three finished unfitted opens.
View attachment 159856
Wickwar Quarries can lay scant claim to this wagon, modelled a decade or so after nationalisation but unusually for an ex-PO vehicle this one survived in general merchandise use.
View attachment 159857
The other side of the same wagon - replicating what Don Rowland saw and pictured just prior to withdrawal - the word on the door is ‘asphaltic’: the vehicle was built for coated road stone.
Next, the LMS pair, a dia. 1666 (somewhat woebegone), and a dia. 1895 (really very tidy) which make a nice study in contrasts, I think.
View attachment 159858
View attachment 159859
View attachment 159860
All in all quite satisfying in a monochrome sort of a way.
Adam
Stephen (@Compound2632),The photo is of a M.R. coupling but most of them were about the same.
View attachment 160674
Stephen (@Compound2632),
Paul (@OzzyO) says in his post that the photo is of a MR wagon, just for interest let us say a D299. What is your take on the coupling hook with the intaglio arc feature?
regards, Graham
How will you disguise the roof join - fill, smooth and cover it with a single ply of plain toilet tissue and trim afterwards?