Jordan, I am with you on this one - separate keys for track which has chairs in the ash ballast is probably a bit left field. For once I am not sure that I understand the BF supremo.
Well we had quite a discussion about the pros and cons, and we four (PJH, S-C-7, Mudhen and I) agreed that there were advantages in not having to sift through separating left-handed chairs from right, or make good rail and/or chairs to allow the passage of the rail past the keyway, plus the advantage of being able to quickly lay only one in half a dozen sleepers or so to quickly build up the alignment of the track, and once all was approved by the PW foreman the remaining sleepers (with a jig-fitted chairs!) could be quickly and simply slid into place, the keys banged in and Bob's your uncle. I'm sure there were other good reasons mooted, but the pork pie was somewhat distracting.
Despite Steve's lovely photo it's actually out of period for BF; the presence of the Diagram 224 50' 1st/3rd non-corridor composite with luggage and lavatory facilities puts the date back to at least 1906, by which time the old Victorian GER method of deep gravel ballasting over the keys on the outside was virtually extinct (a method also used by the Midland as it was supposed that the ballast would help keep the keys from working out).
Apart from that, S-C-7 mentioned to us the financial aspect which (though I've forgotten the figures) definitely precludes these chairs from being used in any great number on BF, so I'm thinking of using them in an easily visible siding on the spectator side of the boards where the ash ballast has been tamped down by foot, hoof and rainfall.