michael mott
Western Thunderer
Love the work on the river Geoff,
Michael
Michael
Thanks Rob, were it not for the ageing process then I might never have stepped up to 7mm scale myself. You are obviously enjoying modelling in 4mm scale, and why not given the quality of today's models?Morning Geoff,
As ever, inspirational stuff. Despite probably never now making that step to 7mm, thanks to you, I keep looking to the forthcoming GWR/WR items such as the Accurascale Panniers and Dapol 517/48/58xx etc...........
Rob
Thanks for your kind words Mark.Amazing, completely atmospheric!
I always thought that G1 was the senior scale, and G 0 was the runt of the litter.Yes, was aware of the move to the "senior scale" (do they still call it that? Have been following on your blog for many years, always inspirational![]()
Actually, in the beginning, Gauge 1 was the smallest size. When Marklin standardised the model railway gauges c.1892, the sizes were numbered 1 (smallest) to 4 (largest). When it became apparent an even smaller size was needed, it had to be numbered nought. Then half-nought (H0). Then the numbering system broke down. I am not quite sure when 0 became O, but no-one refers to nought or zero gauge today — though that is what it was/is.I always thought that G1 was the senior scale, and G 0 was the runt of the litter.
It's still Zero here in France!Actually, in the beginning, Gauge 1 was the smallest size. When Marklin standardised the model railway gauges c.1892, the sizes were numbered 1 (smallest) to 4 (largest). When it became apparent an even smaller size was needed, it had to be numbered nought. Then half-nought (H0). Then the numbering system broke down. I am not quite sure when 0 became O, but no-one refers to nought or zero gauge today — though that is what it was/is.