PhilMortimer
Active Member
Clever!
Do I detect a bit of a ding in the first photo of the cylinders?
I do like the idea of using eccentrics for the inside connecting rods I may have to nick that idea.
ATB
OzzyO.
Hi Ian,Rob,
Looking good.
I've drilled coupling and connecting rods in the past and inserted brass tube for the oiling point and then inserted brass wire to represent the "cork".
Ian
Very nice Rob, but you will have to watch that the studs don't catch the back of the eccentric rods. On P&O (and on the Princess Royals, according to the motion drawing), the nuts are no deeper than the thread diameter and are recessed into the face of the return crank. The studs protrude only a thread pitch or so beyond the nuts. The re-built MN motion drawing shows the nuts standing 20 mm proud of the front face of the return crank and the studs 22 mm (7/8"). Say 0.5 mm in 7 mm scale?. Even so, there's not a huge amount of clearance.
Dave.
Thanks Dave,Very nice Rob, but you will have to watch that the studs don't catch the back of the eccentric rods. On P&O (and on the Princess Royals, according to the motion drawing), the nuts are no deeper than the thread diameter and are recessed into the face of the return crank. The studs protrude only a thread pitch or so beyond the nuts. The re-built MN motion drawing shows the nuts standing 20 mm proud of the front face of the return crank and the studs 22 mm (7/8"). Say 0.5 mm in 7 mm scale?. Even so, there's not a huge amount of clearance.
The return crank has a raised boss on the back at the crankpin and on the front where the eccentric rod attaches. At both bosses, it is 34 mm thick and about 26 mm in the centre section, between the bosses.
Dave.