Model Rail No159
28ten said:
I picked up a copy today, some quite nice s&d stuff, Robert Carrolls article being the pick IMHO. Some of the other pieces such as the article on pre shading were less impressive however. Call me elitist but I don't think I will be rushing to buy another copy any time soon
Hi Cynric,
Overall I enjoyed it too.
I agree, George Dent's work is usually excellent (and the article/work was okay), yet I am not sure if such methods really work (on their own) in terms of railway modelling, because, IMHO, such techniques can be too much of a 'characterture' or too 'cartoon' like for my liking if applied to railway modelling - for a better example just look to Spencer Pollard's work on the JLTRT 26, which uses a whole range of techniques to superb effect (sorry Mr. Dent - although to be fair GD was only demo'ing the basics of the technique)
.
I have seen some wonderful military models ruind by too much pre-shading/dry brushing, especially some of the figures..Horses for courses/appropriatness springs to mind for this technique.
I have explained myself better elsewhere I know, yet in short I endeavour to model my stock as the real thing would have been seen in the late 1960's/early 1970's, so using all techniques available (hardly every happy with my work on the whole - yet striving to do better) 'paint what you see, not what you think you see' is what I aim for.
Yet I do like the look of such pre-shading etc. on some of the finescale NG layouts that I have seen (Roy C Link et al.) because when done well, e.g. a gravel-pit on a 'bright summer's day' modelled using such techniques can look superb!
I enjoyed the layouts and other stuff in MR though perhaps I am not being elistist enough :scratch: :scratch:
CME :wave: