Heyside: 7mm L&Y, late 50s/early 60s
Blimey, what tails of woe...
Richard, I must admit I'm perplexed by your fun with 10001, but my money is still on a mucky signal and that for the price of a few pence the snubber(s) would be worth a try.
Specific points have been raised through the last few hours of postings. So let's try a few quick pointers:
Richard, Brian at ABC may not be able to help you with the 2P. He certainly knows a lot of stuff about setting up his gearboxes with DCC or otherwise, but I know he's not terribly familiar with Lenz stuff. He does know ESU quite well though and so may be able to offer some help with your model of 10001. On 10001 check CV29 before you go much further, the value for ESU or Lenz decoders should be 2 if you're using short addresses, 34 if you're using long; this will set them to digital only operation. And no - I don't think it's a faulty chip. Silicon tends to suffer gross degradation or not at all. Might be worth a reset to check all's well before setting CV29 and re-allocating the address: enter 8 into CV8 and then power cycle the decoder to reset. Just wondering - have you had any problems programming this decoder?
Jordan, I use a SPROG and JMRI DecoderPro for programming because my (Lenz) system doesn't come as standard with a PC interface. The software is free and can be used with systems other than the SPROG; although it's a darned handy combination. Before I had the SPROG all my locos were programmed the hard way, using a programming track. In order to get the consistency you desire it became a case of storing CVs in spreadsheets. Still manual programming though. You could use DecoderPro to do this for you I think, if you fancied that idea. It would give you the option of storing the data either descriptively or as CV values. I know that some CVs are standardised by the NMRA standard, but some are not and all seem to be open to some interpretation. So the only way to tell what CVs do and/or how they behave is to use the decoder manual. The setting of the drive CVs is by it's very nature experimental, most of the decoders I use include a little routine for optimisation which takes a little going through but the results are worthwhile IMHO.
I have to say that while I've been an enthusiastic user of DCC for many years, it's not for everyone. I would never advocate DCC for all. You've got to be comfortable working from manuals (and many in our hobby take some perverse delight in saying they never use kit instructions!), be comfortable with digital technologies and prepared to spend a little time. The results for me have been fantastic, but I recognise some of the features and the effort it took to get here. Just for some examples; better decoders can drive motors below their stall speed, so the scared cat running of a couple of locos has been tamed without needing comprehensive rebuilding (yep - even Lima 00/HO ringfields!). The use of on-board energy stores such as Lenz Power1 has given me 100% reliable running of even very small 0-4-0 locos. I can carry a complete control panel in one hand. With carefull setting up of the drive CVs each of my locos has a custom controller on board which is tailored to that specific motor and model, etc, etc. I should also add that despite some very strange wiring and large layouts I've not personally come across many of the problems described in this thread either!
More on my findings here, for those that are still interested:
http://euram-online.co.uk/dcc/dcc.htm much of it is now out of date, but the theory still seems to hold.
I think that's it for now although much more could and has been said.
I hope we get the layout sorted Richard, and soon. I know how frustrating it can be; even if the last time I had a similar melt down it was with an analogue layout... :scratch:
Steph