Hi
@jonte
Something doesn't look quite right with your proposed window arrangement, so I took a look at some buildings to figure out why.
On large/grand buildings:
1. Windows seem to get smaller as you go up the floors
2. So, smaller windows are unlikely to be alongside larger ones
3. Windows are arranged vertically up the building
4, Lower stories appear higher/taller than the upper floors. Although this may be a an illusion created by the larger windows?
See below for two examples
Maybe have the two large windows on one storey, slightly lower than their current position. Remove the two lowest smaller windows (which make the building look a bit top heavy, and arrange the smaller windows in pairs above.
Dormer windows in the roof would look great!
I hope this helps?
Stephen
St Pancras:
Charing Cross:
Hi Stephen, and thank you for your interest and constructive input.
Apologies for not replying sooner however my grandchildren have only just left.
I concur wholeheartedly with each of your submissions especially the appropriate layout and arrangement of floors and windows as evidenced by your attached photos. Funnily enough, over the last couple of days I’ve revisited many termini including stored photos and internet searches, and whilst doing a search on Kings Cross, images of St. Pancras also flashed up.
For instance, here’s one of Liverpool’s Central High Level station which has been a major influence on my decision making regarding the business end of the build as I refer to it, and indeed shows the arrangement of windows sited large to small as you correctly observe:
As you can tell from my latest research, I’m also not happy with the layout shown thus far so am totally on board with your obs, Stephen.
Perhaps it might help if I account for what you have seen, which was mainly to test the positioning of the balcony windows as touched on previously, although I took the opportunity to determine the number and sizes of windows which could be accommodated using the smaller sash windows, within the exposed area I.e. not obstructed by the positioning of the overall roof, thus only part of the face of the building is a available for the purpose.
As mentioned previously, I acquired window frames of varying sizes prior to starting to give a selection, including one or two from the spares box in addition to the sash windows shown.
Ideally I had the smallest earmarked for the top (Peco from the spares):
…..followed by the small sashes as seen, then onto a lower floor using the longer sash windows from Scale Scenery(?) as sen here:
Although listed as OO gauge, they appear more akin to o gauge such is their length. In all honesty, given the limited space, it would have been difficult to accommodate them to say nothing of looking out of proportion.
As for double window arrangements, I’d considered this as mentioned in a previous post and over the weekend made a mock up using some of the packaging from which they were removed:

To save boring you, this would have created further work and I need quick fix solutions or I’d never finish, so binned the idea - well, using this option for now - and had a bash at creating a stone surround from styrene sheet to create an easier way of making the single arrangement of the small sashes look more formal:
This started to strike a chord, but was still lacking in formality compared to the balconies.
Thus I came up with a simple addition of some more shaped styrene section:
I might use some of the offcuts to increase the length of the frame at the top, but I think for the time save, what you see in the last image should suffice. Currently, I’m also considering returning to the idea of using the tiny Peco sashes at the top again.
I like your idea of placing windows in the dormers, however I’m going to go with prototype here and portray them as they appear in the photos of Blackfriars.
Finally, Stephen, the use of small windows either side of the balconies was purely to add as many ‘holes’ as possible for the planned LEDs to shine out of. Due to the space taken by the balconies on that level, accommodating them thus was simply a case of expediency, if that makes sense?
This is probably one of the drawbacks of fundamental modelling as I refer to it, Stephen, which is very much a case of striking a balance of what it is prototypical and what appeals to the children. As the saying goes , it’s a case of knowing your audience
I hope I haven’t confused you with all of this and that it goes someway to helping you see where I’m coming from.
Thanks once again,
Jon