Having been told that this was an "elitist" journal, my first impression of the
MRJ was one of real disappointment.
For them to claim that they are the best leaves me wondering where they are
looking. I have seen far better reproduction in, what their editors describe as,
"the comics" - Railway Modeller and BRM. The reproduction in those two are far
and above those of this "elistist" journal. And, I must add here, the
reproduction in the GOG Gazette absolutely blows away this "top rated" journal.
I have quoted those paragraphs as I am mystified by them.
Firstly, there is a difference between trying to improve oneself and being elitist, although it does seem that to the majority in the hobby, the two are synonymous: why use this word at all, unless you are unhappy to accept that you could do better, but don't want to? (If you are happy not to push yourself, then all power to your elbow as far as I am concerned, as you won't criticise others who wish to try harder.)
On the second one, I have never seen RM and BRM referred to as "comics" by the "editors" of MRJ. I use this word myself, but I use it also for MRJ. Then again, I am not an editor of MRJ.*
OK, so he feels that the printing of the photos was a disappointment, and fair enough on that score, but that is no reason for the rest of the garbage! The photos whet my appetite for more; knowing that they could be even better is even more mouth watering.
Hohum.
*"I have always tried to do right and be good, so that God would not make me [an] editor." - Mark Twain.